🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just who would win citywide, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for him, where the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However the winner added half a million supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously went for Zohran this year. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does because then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. But overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.